by Dan Royer on Thursday, March 11, 2010
IHA continues to work on resolving and coordinating efforts to address the serious concerns surrounding the controversial “clarification and restatement” of the direct physician supervision requirements included in the outpatient Prospective Payment System/ambulatory surgical center final rule for 2010. The key issue being addressed surrounds the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) requirement that a supervisor be immediately and physically present throughout the duration of outpatient therapeutic services.
IHA has been meeting in-person with each of the offices of Iowa’s congressional delegation and has drafted a delegation letter to CMS urging immediate action on this issue. To date, Senator Tom Harkin, and Representatives Leonard Boswell, Steve King, Tom Latham, and Dave Loebsack have all confirmed their support on the issue and have agreed to sign onto the letter. Staff from the offices of Senators Chuck Grassley and Harkin have also been in contact directly with CMS to outline their concerns and staff for Senate Finance Committee Chair Max Baucus have been in communication with CMS on this issue as well.
Earlier this week, CMS hosted a rural health open door forum conference call and spent most of the time discussing physician supervision. CMS acknowledged the arising complications and encouraged hospitals to continue reaching out to help CMS understand the “real-world” impact of its policy.
CMS verbally qualified its position by stating that physicians or other allied professionals, recognized in the outpatient rule should be “fairly immediately available” and recognized that the rule doesn’t anticipate clinicians “hanging around the emergency department” with no knowledge of anticipated patient arrivals. CMS stated that determination of “immediately available” is essentially at the discretion of the hospital. CMS also acknowledged that this billing policy predominantly creates an issue with observation status, which is currently billed as a therapeutic service. However, CMS stopped short of backing away from the rule as written, but confirmed that further written guidance will be provided on this topic.
IHA will continue working with Iowa’s Congressional Delegation, the Senate Finance Committee staff as well as the American Hospital Association to seek clarification and resolution of this issue. Pending further guidance from CMS, IHA will survey Critical Access Hospital members to further refine its understanding of the scope of the problem and potential solutions.











