Visit our website ⇒

(The following was submitted to the Sioux City Journal in response to this editorial that appeared on December 20.)

wrong-wayThe Iowa Hospital Association has been analyzing and evaluating the state’s plan for privatizing management of the Medicaid program since it was announced nearly a year ago. But long before that, IHA and Iowa’s hospitals accumulated years of experience with this arrangement through Magellan’s contract to manage Medicaid behavioral health services.

It is that analysis and experience that has led IHA to oppose the state’s privatization plan.

With Iowa’s low cost per beneficiary and minimal administrative overhead, the managed care companies will struggle to return any savings to the state. But make no mistake; these huge, for-profit, out-of-state companies that have fought tooth and nail to win a contract from the state will do everything they can to make money from this deal. To accomplish that preeminent goal, they will restrict access to care and they will reduce payments to providers.

This is not a guess or a threat; it is what managed care companies have consistently done across the nation to meet their business goals. In other states, these companies are known not as care managers, but money managers. They control costs by limiting access to care and reimbursement for care to meet their obligations to shareholders. With these restrictions in place, they may even save the state some money, but rest assured that savings will come at a price for Medicaid beneficiaries and the people who care for them.

And be aware that these companies are far more dedicated to shareholders than taxpayers, as evidenced by the research. A rigorous and recent Medicaid managed care study by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation found that “any potential savings will not be significant” and that those savings “generally are due to reductions in provider reimbursement rates rather than managed care techniques.”

Meanwhile, Iowa hospitals and the state have already been working together to coordinate care and reduce costs. Through existing Accountable Care Organizations, Integrated Health Homes, the State Innovation Model and the Iowa Health and Wellness Plan, efforts are underway and creating positive results in Iowa – without the additional cost to taxpayers to cover an out-of-state company’s profit margin. In fact, the University of Iowa Public Policy Center released a report just this past March indicating that existing care coordination through Iowa’s Primary Care Health Home Program has generated 20 percent in savings ($11 million) in its first 18 months.

With results like these already occurring, why is the state looking to eliminate successful programs for an unsuccessful, unnecessary privatized model? And why is the Journal’s editorial board endorsing this plan, especially given the well-reported legal and ethical misdeeds of these companies as well as their botched rollout of the Iowa plan, which has been so poorly managed that the federal government was forced to step in and delay it?

There is no reliable evidence that Medicaid privatization reduces costs, improves quality or increases access to care. This is why Iowa’s hospitals encourage the Journal to reconsider its position and look beyond the claims and promises of companies that have no stake in Iowa, but simply seek to make money off of vulnerable Iowans.

Comments

4 Responses to “Medicaid Privatization Has No Upside for Iowa”
  1. Sharon Lambert says:

    Based on this infor I simply do not understand WHY? 560,000 Iowans face this threat. Iowa’s prison’s and jails will be full, others will die from their own hand. WHY? I simply do not understand. Governor Brandstad please consider leaving this as your legacy, is how you want our State to be known? Is this really how you feel about we, the people, who helped put you in office? Changing your mind will not make you look weak, it will make you look like our Governor.

  2. Teresa says:

    Its not really the state want…just our governor…Terry Brandtad

  3. Jodi says:

    It is sad when saving a buck must come to the expense of the care provided for those people in your own state. Must we suffer at the hand of our very own governor. This was not a joint decision by our representatives but our governor alone. Whom we should be able to trust to care for those in his own state, yet those who are weak and easily taken advantage of are thrown into a sad state of affairs, in which people who are supposed to know answers to our questions, know nothing and we don’t know if we will have adequate care for our needs. Can we keep our own doctors, our specialists, our hospitals? Or will they now be paid so much less they will want out of dealing with the MCOs. These are people who have much stress in their lives to begin with. Many have medical conditions out of their control. They didn’t choose to be in these situations in the first place, but this added stress is too much. Shame on you governor Branstad for only caring about the bottom line. What do you stand to gain from this because we the people stand to lose a lot!

  4. Marty Jorgensen says:

    Thanks to Kirk Norris, and everyone at the Iowa Hospital Association, for the leadership on this issue. Privatizing Medicaid make as much sense as cleaning up Iowa waterways with education funding!

Leave a Comment

Please take a moment to read through our comment policy.

If you would like a photo to appear next to your comment, you'll need to upload a gravatar.