by Scott McIntyre on Tuesday, November 15, 2011
It’s been said that in New York, it’s not whether you win or lose – it’s how you lay the blame. Apparently, some Big Apple hospitals have read that book and passed it along to other big-city providers.“I think the focus needs to be on what staff, physicians and leaders can do to improve the patient experience instead of the ‘throw up your hands’ approach and blaming patients for being more difficult,” said David Brandon, CEO of The Finley Hospital in Dubuque. “You cannot have an ‘opt-out’ culture if you’re going to succeed in creating an exceptional patient environment.”
Both Sioux City and Dubuque are in multi-county hospital referral regions (HRRs) that rank in the top 20 nationwide for patient satisfaction. The HRR around Mason City ranks at the top. Meanwhile, out of nearly 300 HRRs, Manhattan is dead last and Cleveland is 237th.
“Where many CEOs fall down is they see this as a fluff kind of thing,” said Greg Paris, CEO at Monroe County Hospital in Albia, who received IHA’s hospital leadership award in 2007 in part for his work to pull that hospital’s patient satisfaction scores out of the basement. “What they don’t realize is that satisfaction is directly related to quality outcomes, financial results and employee engagement.”
But, he added, “Smiles and singing don’t drive satisfaction.”
Paris talks about how using key words reduces patient anxiety, which improves compliance with care plans and leads to better outcomes. Hourly rounding (“I hear large hospitals gasping,” Paris laughed) reduces patient falls by 50 percent. Checklists reduce errors. Discharge calls save lives because one in six patients has an adverse health event after they go home. Lower employee turnover means fewer mistakes and less harm to patients.
But shouldn’t getting the highly touted care at Cleveland Clinic or NYU be enough? The better question – the one really being asked through HCACHPS and Hospital Compare – is why not expect high-quality care and a first-class patient experience? Anyone who has made use of the Iowa Healthcare Collaborative’s “Iowa Report” will see Iowa hospitals are uniformly committed to both.
“Yes, we need to have the right facilities and evidence-based strategies in place, but more than anything else it is the never-ending commitment to create a culture that holds service in the highest regard,” said Brandon. “Without the right culture, the strategies and facilities alone will not allow you to meet the expectations of your patients.”
And because of the growing amount of publicly available data, hospitals cannot depend on just their word-of-mouth reputations or referrals. “The next generation will pick their hospital based on outcomes and experience, not just by where their doctor sends them,” noted Paris.













I wonder if over-crowding, double-bedded rooms, lack of a primary care infrastructure, patients without social support (homes to go to after discharge), over 100 languages and cultures represented in the population have anything to do with it? Probably not… i’m sure it’s just like that across the country.
Please have a look at below. I think it truly is more complicated than your post above.
http://blogs.hospitalmedicine.org/SHMPracticeManagementBlog/?p=3751
The original post above actually hits the mark. There is a direct correlation between tools that drive satisfaction (i.e. key words that improve communication) and clinical outcomes. There is cause and effect between hourly rounding, reduced falls, and the number of elderly who die from falls. There are big hospitals with great patient satisfaction and midwest rural hospitals with terrible results. The truth is we are more alike than we are different. When hospitals and bloggers stop rationalizing and creating reasons why their bad results are invalid or dont matter, they can actually start working on improvement. It’s the right thing to do and the truth is most large hospitals really didn’t care about satisfaction of the people paying the bills until it has started hitting their wallets.